Export Control Reform has brought a standardized definition
of the term “specially designed” for both the EAR and the ITAR. The term
certainly relaxes the rules, but the complexity of the rules remains. For items
on the Commerce Control List (CCL), the definition relates to the determination
of the Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) or EAR99 (No license
required) classification. The term as defined in the ITAR essentially determines
the jurisdiction of the items and whether it will remain on the U.S. Munitions
List (USML) or move to the CCL.
The definition of “specially designed” is similar for both
regulations but must be looked at separately to make an appropriate determination.
Because many products have shifted from the USML to the CCL, if an exporter has
solely dealt with ITAR-controlled products in the past, I would recommend the
ITAR “Specially Designed” tool as a starting point.
The structure / use of the ‘specially designed’ provision is
the same for the CCL and USML – both utilize the “catch and release” method. Paragraph
(a) is the “catch” provision (of many items) and Paragraph (b) is the “release”.
Paragraph(a) seeks to control items that warrant.
For a product to qualify as “specially designed” it has to meet
all of the requirements of Paragraph (a) and NONE of the requirements of Subparagraphs
to (b). It was much easier to explain what was NOT “specially designed”
therefore Paragraph (b) is very detailed in its inclusion of parts, components,
accessories, etc. In an effort to eliminate discretion from companies and subjectivity,
several other key terms are now defined as notes within the “specially
designed” definition. Other defined terms include: commodity, production, and
development among others.
In Paragraph (b)(3), there is mention of “equivalent” form
or fit. Its worthy to point out that “equivalent” here means that the “form has
been modified solely for fit purposes” and also important to note that the
“fit” can changes as long as it doesn’t change the performance
capabilities.
With regard to Paragraph (b)(4) and (5), the term
“knowledge” actually means that the said “knowledge” during development must be
in writing. While this isn’t stated outright in the definition; clearly looking
into the mind of the original designer or intent of an item at conception is
difficult, therefore records must be kept.
If, after going through the “Specially Designed” decision
tools, there is still uncertainty about a commodity classification the exporter
can still choose to file a Commodity Jurisdiction (CJ) request through DoS or
Commodity Classification Automated Tracking System (CCATS) with DoC. See my
previous post on CJ requests at: http://export-dinary.blogspot/2014/02/pick-commodity-any-commodity.html.
The purpose of the “Specially Designed”
tools is to assist exporters with eliminating the need for a CJ or CCATS.
A strong understanding of the new rules and definitions
coupled with the Tools that have been provided assist exporters in making solid
and confident decisions about proper commodity classifications.
Useful link for the DoS DDTC Specially Designed Tool: http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/licensing/dt_SpeciallyDesigned.htm
Useful link for the the DoC, BIS Specially Designed Tool: http://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/specially-designed-tool
Link to ITAR 120.41, Definition of “specially designed”: http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=86008bdffd1fb2e79cc5df41a180750a&node=22:1.0.1.13.57&rgn=div5#22:1.0.1.13.57.0.31.41
Link to EAR772.1, Definition of “specially designed”: http://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/regulations/export-administration-regulations-ear
The DoS DDTC has a very useful link for a Commodity
Jurisdiction request: http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/commodity_jurisdiction/index.html
The DoC, BIS has a very useful link for Classification
requests: http://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/licensing/commerce-control-list-classification/classification-request-guidelines
Need help with export controls? TSA Inc. can help!
Heidi France is a Lead
International Trade Specialist, Technology Security Associates, Inc.
Email:
heidi_france@theTSAteam.com
Contributor: Jackie
Sudore-Flood, Director of International Programs, Technology Security Associates,
Inc., Email: jackie_sudore-flood@theTSAteam.com
No comments:
Post a Comment